When Oh Dae-Su is freed from the prison, he is completely disoriented and without, further illustrating his emasculation. Indeed, even though he feels he is free, he is told and soon finds for himself that he is only living in a bigger prison. This theme of the cage is found in both films and relates to the powerlessness experienced by the characters, both male and female. The extremely violent acts Oh Dae-Su commits indicate an overcompensation for his lack that is traditionally feminine and that Joyrich sees as an example of hypermasculinity. Over the course of the film, Oh Dae-Su discovers that he is less and less his own person; in the final scene with Lee Woo-Jin, Lee Woo-Jin tells Oh Dae-Su that he was controlled by auto-suggestion. However, Oh Dae-Su's loss of identity reaches a new height in the climactic scene where he prostrates himself, barking like a dog, in front of Lee Woo-Jin. This scene illustrates Oh Dae-Su's complete loss of identity and he truly becomes no better than a beast. The question remains whether Oh Dae-Su ever regains his identity or whether this is even possible. It seems that he is forever altered. Despite having split himself from "the Monster" that has resulted from his imprisonment, Oh Dae-Su remains in a weakened state, relying on Mi-Do, a sign of the remnants of his crisis of masculinity.
What is the significance of a film like "Old Boy" being produced in 2003? Cho and Chung's analyses of "The Stray Bullet" rely on a specific historical context: the postcolonial era following the split between North and South Korea. "Old Boy" was made almost forty years later though many of the same themes and issues persist. What does this suggest about South Korean cinema, the mindset engendered by early postcolonial cinema, and the cultural paradigms that persist despite an increasingly globalized world?
No comments:
Post a Comment